- Symantec(SYMC) is coming back – Symantec has made a lot of operating mistakes over the years, but is starting to turn things around. He likes its planned Veritas spinoff [it ended up being sold to PE firm]. Basically, he thinks McAfee is in trouble once Symantec starts focusing on its core business because McAfee hasn’t been able to take advantage while its peer struggled.
- Brand Confusion – Intel isn’t known for security and the McAfee name has some odd associations. Not a good fit.
- Internet of Things – the PC market is slowing and Intel’s Internet of Things division is growing quickly. It should focus on the growing areas and not on McAfee
- Finance – basically, a spinoff could avoid a possible goodwill writedown and also, security companies are attracting high multiples these days so maybe McAfee would as well
- Security is changing too rapidly – as a division of Intel it will be hard for McAfee to keep up with the rapid changes in the space. Focused management would be a boon
Some of these reasons are more compelling than others and have been offered as reasons for plenty of other spins. For example, multiple rerating is quite common. Typically, that is something an activist would point out, but are high flying companies in the space really McAfee peers?
It’s difficult to fully get a handle on the current state of McAfee’s business because as Mr. Stiennon notes, Intel buried McAfee into one of its reporting units. Based on the revenues at the time of the acquisition and on the unit’s current revenues, growth appears to have been non-existent. It’s quite possible sales have actually declined over the years. Goodwill doesn’t tell the entire story.
An interesting idea, but perhaps Intel likes the business and views it as an avenue of growth while its chip business matures. Of course, a spinoff would be an open admission that its 2010 $7b+ acquisition of McAfee was a bust – not too many management teams are keen to make such statements.
Nothing going on here right now, but worth filing this one away.
Disclosure: Author holds shares of DIS and TWX
Ah yes. But the current management team is different from the one that made the McAfee blunder. Perfect time to unwind that deal. In a hot market for cyber security firms (look at PANW, even FEYE) they may even get their money back.
Thanks for noticing my column!
@stiennon Very true on both points. Valuations are hot in corporate security and it would be a classic move to unwind an ‘old management’ deal.
The new CEO is a Intel lifer though and has been a senior guy for a long time – might have less credibility on that front. Maybe they don’t want to show how bad it has been doing?
Anyways, thanks for reading and commenting.